linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.16 189/410] Btrfs: fix use-after-free on root->orphan_block

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:05:21 +0100
From:   Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Josef Bacik" <jbacik@...com>,
        "Liu Bo" <bo.li.liu@...cle.com>, "David Sterba" <dsterba@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 189/410] Btrfs: fix use-after-free on root->orphan_block_rsv

3.16.57-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@...cle.com>

commit 1a932ef4e47984dee227834667b5ff5a334e4805 upstream.

I got these from running generic/475,

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 26384 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:3326 btrfs_orphan_commit_root+0x1ac/0x2b0 [btrfs]
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010
IP: btrfs_block_rsv_release+0x1c/0x70 [btrfs]
Call Trace:
  btrfs_orphan_release_metadata+0x9f/0x200 [btrfs]
  btrfs_orphan_del+0x10d/0x170 [btrfs]
  btrfs_setattr+0x500/0x640 [btrfs]
  notify_change+0x7ae/0x870
  do_truncate+0xca/0x130
  vfs_truncate+0x2ee/0x3d0
  do_sys_truncate+0xaf/0xf0
  SyS_truncate+0xe/0x10
  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0x96

The race is between btrfs_orphan_commit_root and btrfs_orphan_del,
        t1                                        t2
btrfs_orphan_commit_root                     btrfs_orphan_del
   spin_lock
   check (&root->orphan_inodes)
   root->orphan_block_rsv = NULL;
   spin_unlock
                                             atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
                                             access root->orphan_block_rsv

Accessing root->orphan_block_rsv must be done before decreasing
root->orphan_inodes.

Fixes: 703c88e03524 ("Btrfs: fix tracking of orphan inode count")
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: Drop the added comment in a path that's
 unreachable here]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 fs/btrfs/inode.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -3082,12 +3082,17 @@ int btrfs_orphan_add(struct btrfs_trans_
 	if (insert >= 1) {
 		ret = btrfs_insert_orphan_item(trans, root, btrfs_ino(inode));
 		if (ret) {
-			atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
 			if (reserve) {
 				clear_bit(BTRFS_INODE_ORPHAN_META_RESERVED,
 					  &BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags);
 				btrfs_orphan_release_metadata(inode);
 			}
+			/*
+			 * btrfs_orphan_commit_root may race with us and set
+			 * ->orphan_block_rsv to zero, in order to avoid that,
+			 * decrease ->orphan_inodes after everything is done.
+			 */
+			atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
 			if (ret != -EEXIST) {
 				clear_bit(BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM,
 					  &BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags);
@@ -3119,28 +3124,26 @@ static int btrfs_orphan_del(struct btrfs
 {
 	struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(inode)->root;
 	int delete_item = 0;
-	int release_rsv = 0;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	spin_lock(&root->orphan_lock);
 	if (test_and_clear_bit(BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM,
 			       &BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags))
 		delete_item = 1;
 
+	if (delete_item && trans)
+		ret = btrfs_del_orphan_item(trans, root, btrfs_ino(inode));
+
 	if (test_and_clear_bit(BTRFS_INODE_ORPHAN_META_RESERVED,
 			       &BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags))
-		release_rsv = 1;
-	spin_unlock(&root->orphan_lock);
+		btrfs_orphan_release_metadata(inode);
 
-	if (delete_item) {
+	/*
+	 * btrfs_orphan_commit_root may race with us and set ->orphan_block_rsv
+	 * to zero, in order to avoid that, decrease ->orphan_inodes after
+	 * everything is done.
+	 */
+	if (delete_item)
 		atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
-		if (trans)
-			ret = btrfs_del_orphan_item(trans, root,
-						    btrfs_ino(inode));
-	}
-
-	if (release_rsv)
-		btrfs_orphan_release_metadata(inode);
 
 	return ret;
 }