[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1528380321.588637526@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:05:21 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 160/410] scsi: fas216: fix sense buffer initialization
3.16.57-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
commit 96d5eaa9bb74d299508d811d865c2c41b38b0301 upstream.
While testing with the ARM specific memset() macro removed, I ran into a
compiler warning that shows an old bug:
drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c: In function 'fas216_rq_sns_done':
drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:2014:40: error: argument to 'sizeof' in 'memset' call is the same expression as the destination; did you mean to provide an explicit length? [-Werror=sizeof-pointer-memaccess]
It turns out that the definition of the scsi_cmd structure changed back
in linux-2.6.25, so now we clear only four bytes (sizeof(pointer))
instead of 96 (SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE). I did not check whether we
actually need to initialize the buffer here, but it's clear that if we
do it, we should use the correct size.
Fixes: de25deb18016 ("[SCSI] use dynamically allocated sense buffer")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c
@@ -2009,7 +2009,7 @@ static void fas216_rq_sns_done(FAS216_In
* have valid data in the sense buffer that could
* confuse the higher levels.
*/
- memset(SCpnt->sense_buffer, 0, sizeof(SCpnt->sense_buffer));
+ memset(SCpnt->sense_buffer, 0, SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE);
//printk("scsi%d.%c: sense buffer: ", info->host->host_no, '0' + SCpnt->device->id);
//{ int i; for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) printk("%02x ", SCpnt->sense_buffer[i]); printk("\n"); }
/*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists