[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEJqkggkZynDvV8XxkFfy89x-DX5xDTyubUJ3oXBO6eUjBWBKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2018 15:32:06 +0200
From: Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...il.com>
To: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin@...illa.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
alexander.deucher@....com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net>
Subject: Re: Kernel and ADM hardware roulette ( was AMD graphics performance
regression in 4.15 and later )
2018-06-08 8:52 GMT+02:00 Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>:
> Am 08.06.2018 um 08:02 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 02:32:46PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
>>>
>>> Ok done.. bisect points to:
>>
>> What is the failure mode you are seeing? Can't find anything in the
>> mail unfortunately.
>
>
> As far as I analyzed it we now get an -ENOMEM from dma_alloc_attrs() in
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc_dma.c when IOMMU is enabled.
>
> Still need to figure out which parameters we want to use for the allocation,
> but I think it is only 4k or 8k.
When you guys need me to test something , or run debug patches
or patches of any sort just let me know..
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
BR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists