[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bbce31a6e59fdfa00e565e09dcae9eea@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 10:27:19 +0530
From: poza@...eaurora.org
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@...wei.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>, Wei Zhang <wzhang@...com>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH NEXT 6/6] PCI/PORTDRV: Remove ERR_FATAL handling from
pcie_portdrv_slot_reset()
On 2018-06-08 03:04, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 07:18:03PM +0530, poza@...eaurora.org wrote:
>> On 2018-06-07 11:30, Oza Pawandeep wrote:
>> > We are handling ERR_FATAL by resetting the Link in software,skipping the
>> > driver pci_error_handlers callbacks, removing the devices from the PCI
>> > subsystem, and re-enumerating, as a result of that, no more calling
>> > pcie_portdrv_slot_reset in ERR_FATAL case.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Oza Pawandeep <poza@...eaurora.org>
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
>> > b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
>> > index 973f1b8..92f5d330 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
>> > @@ -42,17 +42,6 @@ __setup("pcie_ports=", pcie_port_setup);
>> >
>> > /* global data */
>> >
>> > -static int pcie_portdrv_restore_config(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> > -{
>> > - int retval;
>> > -
>> > - retval = pci_enable_device(dev);
>> > - if (retval)
>> > - return retval;
>> > - pci_set_master(dev);
>> > - return 0;
>> > -}
>> > -
>> > #ifdef CONFIG_PM
>> > static int pcie_port_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> > {
>> > @@ -162,14 +151,6 @@ static pci_ers_result_t
>> > pcie_portdrv_mmio_enabled(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> >
>> > static pci_ers_result_t pcie_portdrv_slot_reset(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> > {
>> > - /* If fatal, restore cfg space for possible link reset at upstream */
>> > - if (dev->error_state == pci_channel_io_frozen) {
>> > - dev->state_saved = true;
>> > - pci_restore_state(dev);
>> > - pcie_portdrv_restore_config(dev);
>> > - pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting(dev);
>> > - }
>> > -
>> > return PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED;
>> > }
>>
>>
>> Hi Bjorn,
>>
>> the above patch removes ERR_FATAL handling from
>> pcie_portdrv_slot_reset()
>> because now we are handling ERR_FATAL differently than before.
>>
>> I tried to dig into pcie_portdrv_slot_reset() handling for ERR_FATAL
>> case
>> where it
>> restores the config space, enable device, set master and enable error
>> reporting....
>> and as far as I understand this is being done for upstream link
>> (bridges
>> etc..)
>>
>> why was it done at the first point (I checked the commit description,
>> but
>> could not really get it)
>> and do we need to handle the same thing in ERR_FATAL now ?
>
> You mean 4bf3392e0bf5 ("PCI-Express AER implemetation: pcie_portdrv
> error handler"), which added pcie_portdrv_slot_reset()? I agree, that
> commit log has no useful information. I don't know any of the history
> behind it.
Yes Bjorn thats right.
I am trying to understand it but no clue.
since it is restoring the stuffs in ERR_FATAL case, why would PCIe
bridge loose all the settings ? [config space, aer bits, master, device
enable etc..)
Max we do is link_reset in ERR_FATAL case, and Secondary bus reset
should affect downstream components (not upstream)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists