lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MWHPR02MB2623AA49F71D3D24B997C682AF7B0@MWHPR02MB2623.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Jun 2018 05:20:33 +0000
From:   Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@...inx.com>
To:     Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
CC:     "boris.brezillon@...tlin.com" <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
        "richard@....at" <richard@....at>,
        "wmw2@...radead.org" <wmw2@...radead.org>,
        "computersforpeace@...il.com" <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        "marek.vasut@...il.com" <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        "f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "mmayer@...adcom.com" <mmayer@...adcom.com>,
        "rogerq@...com" <rogerq@...com>,
        "ladis@...ux-mips.org" <ladis@...ux-mips.org>,
        "ada@...rsis.com" <ada@...rsis.com>,
        "honghui.zhang@...iatek.com" <honghui.zhang@...iatek.com>,
        "linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "nagasureshkumarrelli@...il.com" <nagasureshkumarrelli@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [LINUX PATCH v9 1/4] Devicetree: Add pl353 smc controller
 devicetree binding information

Hi Miquel,

Thanks for the review.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Miquel Raynal [mailto:miquel.raynal@...tlin.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 9:12 PM
> To: Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@...inx.com>
> Cc: boris.brezillon@...tlin.com; richard@....at; wmw2@...radead.org;
> computersforpeace@...il.com; marek.vasut@...il.com; f.fainelli@...il.com;
> mmayer@...adcom.com; rogerq@...com; ladis@...ux-mips.org; ada@...rsis.com;
> honghui.zhang@...iatek.com; linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> nagasureshkumarrelli@...il.com
> Subject: Re: [LINUX PATCH v9 1/4] Devicetree: Add pl353 smc controller devicetree
> binding information
> 
> Hi Naga,
> 
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 13:19:39 +0530, Naga Sureshkumar Relli
> <naga.sureshkumar.relli@...inx.com> wrote:
> 
> > Add pl353 static memory controller devicetree binding information.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Naga Sureshkumar Relli
> > <naga.sureshkumar.relli@...inx.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v9:
> >  - Addressed commens given by Randy Dunlap and Miquel Raynal
> 
> Can you please be more specific in your next changelog? I don't remember what I suggested a
> few months ago :)
Ok, I will update.

> 
> > Changes in v8:
> >  - None
> > Changes in v7:
> > - Corrected clocks description
> > - prefixed '#' for address and size cells Changes in v6:
> >  - None
> > Changes in v5:
> >  - Removed timing properties
> > Changes in v4:
> >  - none
> > Changes in v3:
> >  - none
> > Changes in v2:
> >  - modified timing binding info as per onfi timing parameters
> >  - add suffix nano second as timing unit
> >  - modified the clock names as per the IP spec
> > ---
> >  .../bindings/memory-controllers/pl353-smc.txt      | 53
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/pl353-smc.txt
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/pl353-smc.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/pl353-smc.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..551e66b
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/pl353-smc.t
> > +++ xt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
> > +Device tree bindings for ARM PL353 static memory controller
> > +
> > +PL353 static memory controller supports two kinds of memory
> > +interfaces.i.e NAND and SRAM/NOR interfaces.
> > +The actual devices are instantiated from the child nodes of pl353 smc node.
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible		: Should be "arm,pl353-smc-r2p1"
> 
> I thing Rob prefers:
> 
> - compatible: Must be one of:
>   * arm, pl353-smc-r2p1
Are you suggesting any other compatibles?
Or just a change from "should be to Must be one of"?
> 
> > +- reg			: Controller registers map and length.
> > +- clock-names		: List of input clock names - "ref_clk", "aper_clk"
> > +			  (See clock bindings for details).
> > +- clocks		: Clock phandles (see clock bindings for details).
> > +- address-cells		: Address cells, must be 1.
> > +- size-cells		: Size cells. Must be 1.
> 
> Please avoid padding, just this is enough:
> 
> - something: And another thing.
Ok, I will update it.

> 
> > +
> > +Child nodes:
> > + For NAND the "arm,pl353-nand-r2p1" and for NOR the "cfi-flash"
> > +drivers are supported as child nodes.
> > +
> > +Mandatory timing properties for child nodes:
> > +- arm,nand-cycle-t0	: Read cycle time(t_rc).
> > +- arm,nand-cycle-t1	: Write cycle time(t_wc).
> > +- arm,nand-cycle-t2	: re_n assertion delay(t_rea).
> > +- arm,nand-cycle-t3	: we_n de-assertion delay(t_wp).
> > +- arm,nand-cycle-t4	: Status read time(t_clr)
> > +- arm,nand-cycle-t5	: ID read time(t_ar)
> > +- arm,nand-cycle-t6	: busy to re_n(t_rr)
> 
> I think this has nothing to do in the DT, you should handle timings from the -
> >setup_data_interface() hook. If you need, you may use different compatibles to distinguish
> different platform data.
> 
This controller is applicable only to Zynq platform. No other platform will use this.
Basically pl353-smc.c and pl353-nand.c, both are different drivers.
And this data_interface hook is in nand, and to set this timings if we read it from setup_data_interface(), then
We need to make call from nand to smc driver.
Let me try this.

> > +
> > +for nand partition information please refer the below file
> 
> s/nand/NAND/
I will update in next version.

> 
> > +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partition.txt
> > +
> > +Example:
> > +	pl353smcc_0: pl353smcc@...0e000 {
> 
> Why not something more explicit with the '-flash-controller' suffix?
Is this ok?
smcc: memory-controller@...0e000 {}

> 
> > +			compatible = "arm,pl353-smc-r2p1"
> > +			clock-names = "memclk", "aclk";
> > +			clocks = <&clkc 11>, <&clkc 44>;
> > +			reg = <0xe000e000 0x1000>;
> > +			#address-cells = <1>;
> > +			#size-cells = <1>;
> > +			ranges;
> > +			nand_0: nand@...00000 {
> > +				compatible = "arm,pl353-nand-r2p1"
> 
> NAND chips do not have their own compatible.
As I said above, SMCC controller has two interface(NAND, NOR/SRAM).
So to differentiate which interface is selected, we added the compatible.
The dts node looks below.
smcc: memory-controller@...0e000 {
			#address-cells = <1>;
			#size-cells = <1>;
			clock-names = "memclk", "aclk";
			clocks = <&clkc 11>, <&clkc 44>;
			compatible = "arm,pl353-smc-r2p1";
			interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
			interrupts = <0 18 4>;
			ranges ;
			reg = <0xe000e000 0x1000>;
			nand0: flash@...00000 {
				compatible = "arm,pl353-nand-r2p1";
				reg = <0xe1000000 0x1000000>;
				#address-cells = <0x1>;
				#size-cells = <0x1>;
			};
			nor0: flash@...00000 {
				compatible = "cfi-flash";
				reg = <0xe2000000 0x2000000>;
				#address-cells = <1>;
				#size-cells = <1>;
			};
		};
> 
> > +				reg = <0xe1000000 0x1000000>;
> > +				arm,nand-cycle-t0 = <0x4>;
> > +				arm,nand-cycle-t1 = <0x4>;
> > +				arm,nand-cycle-t2 = <0x1>;
> > +				arm,nand-cycle-t3 = <0x2>;
> > +				arm,nand-cycle-t4 = <0x2>;
> > +				arm,nand-cycle-t5 = <0x2>;
> > +				arm,nand-cycle-t6 = <0x4>;
> > +				(...)
> > +			};
> > +	};
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Miquèl

Thanks,
Naga Sureshkumar Relli.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ