[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180609145950.731645550@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2018 17:29:55 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.16 43/48] net : sched: cls_api: deal with egdev path only if needed
4.16-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
[ Upstream commit f8f4bef322e4600c5856911c7a632c0e3da920d6 ]
When dealing with ingress rule on a netdev, if we did fine through the
conventional path, there's no need to continue into the egdev route,
and we can stop right there.
Not doing so may cause a 2nd rule to be added by the cls api layer
with the ingress being the egdev.
For example, under sriov switchdev scheme, a user rule of VFR A --> VFR B
will end up with two HW rules (1) VF A --> VF B and (2) uplink --> VF B
Fixes: 208c0f4b5237 ('net: sched: use tc_setup_cb_call to call per-block callbacks')
Signed-off-by: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/sched/cls_api.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
@@ -1587,7 +1587,7 @@ int tc_setup_cb_call(struct tcf_block *b
return ret;
ok_count = ret;
- if (!exts)
+ if (!exts || ok_count)
return ok_count;
ret = tc_exts_setup_cb_egdev_call(exts, type, type_data, err_stop);
if (ret < 0)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists