linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.14 01/41] scsi: sd_zbc: Fix potential memory leak

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180609152926.475797635@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Sat,  9 Jun 2018 17:29:33 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        "David.butterfield" <david.butterfield@....com>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 01/41] scsi: sd_zbc: Fix potential memory leak

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>

commit 4b433924b2755a94f99258c178684a0e05c344de upstream.

Rework sd_zbc_check_zone_size() to avoid a memory leak due to an early
return if sd_zbc_report_zones() fails.

Reported-by: David.butterfield <david.butterfield@....com>
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c |   34 +++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c
@@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ static int sd_zbc_check_capacity(struct
 
 static int sd_zbc_check_zone_size(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)
 {
-	u64 zone_blocks;
+	u64 zone_blocks = 0;
 	sector_t block = 0;
 	unsigned char *buf;
 	unsigned char *rec;
@@ -443,10 +443,8 @@ static int sd_zbc_check_zone_size(struct
 
 	/* Do a report zone to get the same field */
 	ret = sd_zbc_report_zones(sdkp, buf, SD_ZBC_BUF_SIZE, 0);
-	if (ret) {
-		zone_blocks = 0;
-		goto out;
-	}
+	if (ret)
+		goto out_free;
 
 	same = buf[4] & 0x0f;
 	if (same > 0) {
@@ -489,7 +487,7 @@ static int sd_zbc_check_zone_size(struct
 			ret = sd_zbc_report_zones(sdkp, buf,
 						  SD_ZBC_BUF_SIZE, block);
 			if (ret)
-				return ret;
+				goto out_free;
 		}
 
 	} while (block < sdkp->capacity);
@@ -497,34 +495,32 @@ static int sd_zbc_check_zone_size(struct
 	zone_blocks = sdkp->zone_blocks;
 
 out:
-	kfree(buf);
-
 	if (!zone_blocks) {
 		if (sdkp->first_scan)
 			sd_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdkp,
 				  "Devices with non constant zone "
 				  "size are not supported\n");
-		return -ENODEV;
-	}
-
-	if (!is_power_of_2(zone_blocks)) {
+		ret = -ENODEV;
+	} else if (!is_power_of_2(zone_blocks)) {
 		if (sdkp->first_scan)
 			sd_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdkp,
 				  "Devices with non power of 2 zone "
 				  "size are not supported\n");
-		return -ENODEV;
-	}
-
-	if (logical_to_sectors(sdkp->device, zone_blocks) > UINT_MAX) {
+		ret = -ENODEV;
+	} else if (logical_to_sectors(sdkp->device, zone_blocks) > UINT_MAX) {
 		if (sdkp->first_scan)
 			sd_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdkp,
 				  "Zone size too large\n");
-		return -ENODEV;
+		ret = -ENODEV;
+	} else {
+		sdkp->zone_blocks = zone_blocks;
+		sdkp->zone_shift = ilog2(zone_blocks);
 	}
 
-	sdkp->zone_blocks = zone_blocks;
+out_free:
+	kfree(buf);
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int sd_zbc_setup(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)