[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdkDCCJCqBTGsPCzaCKfT_bqYNGDQekvr56U3fhR+uthA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2018 22:34:43 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Anton Vasilyev <vasilyev@...ras.ru>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
Gaurav Pathak <gauravpathak129@...il.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ldv-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rts5208: add check on NULL before dereference
On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 7:58 PM, <okaya@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> On 2018-06-09 12:38, Anton Vasilyev wrote:
>>
>> If rtsx_probe fails to allocate dev->chip, then NULL pointer
>> dereference occurs at rtsx_release_resources().
>>
>> Patch adds checks chip on NULL before its dereference at
>> rtsx_release_resources and passing with dereference inside
>> rtsx_release_chip.
>>
>> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
> I think you should bail out if dev->chip is null rather than adding
> conditiinals.
I'm wondering if it's false positive. At which circumstances that may happen?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists