[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f0b74e71-d3ef-9d51-24ab-9becd8b80f33@deltatee.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2018 18:09:37 -0600
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ntb@...glegroups.com
Cc: Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Allen Hubbe <allenbh@...il.com>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] NTB: perf: Don't require one more memory window than
peer
Oops, sorry, I double posted patch 5. Please disregard the second one.
Logan
On 08/06/18 06:08 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> NTB Perf should not require more than one memory window per peer. This
> was probably an off-by-one error.
>
> Fixes: 5648e56d03fa ("NTB: ntb_perf: Add full multi-port NTB API support")
> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
> ---
> drivers/ntb/test/ntb_perf.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ntb/test/ntb_perf.c b/drivers/ntb/test/ntb_perf.c
> index 2a9d6b0d1f19..fe27412ffe91 100644
> --- a/drivers/ntb/test/ntb_perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/ntb/test/ntb_perf.c
> @@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ static int perf_init_service(struct perf_ctx *perf)
> {
> u64 mask;
>
> - if (ntb_peer_mw_count(perf->ntb) < perf->pcnt + 1) {
> + if (ntb_peer_mw_count(perf->ntb) < perf->pcnt) {
> dev_err(&perf->ntb->dev, "Not enough memory windows\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists