[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180610044050.GL30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2018 05:41:07 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/39] vfs: optionally don't account file in nr_files
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 04:43:05PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> +++ b/fs/open.c
> @@ -732,8 +732,8 @@ static int do_dentry_open(struct file *f,
> static const struct file_operations empty_fops = {};
> int error;
>
> - f->f_mode = OPEN_FMODE(f->f_flags) | FMODE_LSEEK |
> - FMODE_PREAD | FMODE_PWRITE;
> + f->f_mode = (f->f_mode & FMODE_NOACCOUNT) | OPEN_FMODE(f->f_flags) |
> + FMODE_LSEEK | FMODE_PREAD | FMODE_PWRITE;
Why bother with this complexity? I mean, why not simply
f->f_mode |= OPEN_FMODE(f->f_flags) | FMODE_LSEEK |
FMODE_PREAD | FMODE_PWRITE;
and be done with that...
> @@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ static int do_dentry_open(struct file *f,
> f->f_wb_err = filemap_sample_wb_err(f->f_mapping);
>
> if (unlikely(f->f_flags & O_PATH)) {
> - f->f_mode = FMODE_PATH;
> + f->f_mode = (f->f_mode & FMODE_NOACCOUNT) | FMODE_PATH;
That makes no sense at all. What would ever pass O_PATH opens
from "noaccount" call site?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists