linux-kernel - Re: Possible regression caused by commit a192aa923b66a

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 11 Jun 2018 10:09:39 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        perryhelionsemail@...il.com,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Possible regression caused by commit a192aa923b66a

On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 8:26 AM, Kai-Heng Feng
<kai.heng.feng@...onical.com> wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> There's a regression report [1] that says commit a192aa923b66a ("ACPI /
> LPSS: Consolidate runtime PM and system sleep handling") is the first bad
> commit.
>
> From the looks of it, it didn't introduce any behavioral change. So your
> help is appreciated.
>
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774950

Well, the only difference is the iosf quirk AFAICS, but that should be
easy enough to check.  I'll try to cut a patch for that later today.