[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdb=Vfs6R+576+Wjh1cOh8ti-8jkGhj7Pw8zXdOxvHKOCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 10:46:59 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>, linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot@...ts.denx.de>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] microblaze: Remove architecture heart beat code
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 8:09 AM, Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com> wrote:
> There is no reason to keep this gpio based code in architecture. Use
> ledtrig-heartbeat.c instead which is much more flexible then this
> ancient code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Maybe the arch maintainers will complain that the corresponding
new heartbeat code is not put in place in the same patch, but I
think the change is so much overdue that I don't see why they
can't do that themselves if they have interest in it.
BTW: m68k has the same kind of luggage, in the middle of it
timekeeping code:
arch/m68k/kernel/time.c
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists