[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1862022.905gDpZtpO@dimapc>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 14:45:45 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
Cc: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>, dwmw2@...radead.org,
computersforpeace@...il.com, marek.vasut@...il.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, thierry.reding@...il.com,
dev@...xeye.de, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at,
marcel@...wiler.com, krzk@...nel.org, benjamin.lindqvist@...ian.se,
jonathanh@...dia.com, pdeschrijver@...dia.com, pgaikwad@...dia.com,
mirza.krak@...il.com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] mtd: rawnand: add NVIDIA Tegra NAND Flash controller driver
On Sunday, 10 June 2018 18:32:02 MSK Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jun 2018 18:00:06 +0300
>
> Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com> wrote:
> > > >> That seems a lot of work for a code path I do not intend to ever use
> > > >> :-)
> > > >
> > > > Are you sure that resetting HW resets the timing and other registers
> > > > configuration? Reset implementation is HW-specific, like for example
> > > > in a
> > > > case of a video decoder the registers state is re-intialized on HW
> > > > reset,
> > > > but registers configuration is untouched in a case of resetting GPU.
> > > > I'd
> > > > suggest to check whether NAND controller resetting affects the HW
> > > > configuration.
> > >
> > > It seems all registers are set back to their documented reset value:
> > >
> > > [boot loader/ROM initialized values]
> > > [ 1.270253] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: Tegra NAND controller register
> > > dump
> > > [ 1.277051] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: COMMAND: 0x66880104
> > > [ 1.282457] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: STATUS: 0x00000101
> > > [ 1.287763] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: ISR: 0x01000120
> > > [ 1.292818] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: IER: 0x00000000
> > > [ 1.297863] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: CONFIG: 0x00840000
> > > [ 1.303181] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: TIMING: 0x05040000
> > > [ 1.308486] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: TIMING2: 0x00000003
> > > [ 1.313897] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: CMD_REG1: 0x00000000
> > > [ 1.319377] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: CMD_REG2: 0x00000030
> > > [ 1.324868] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: ADDR_REG1: 0x03000000
> > > [ 1.330435] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: ADDR_REG2: 0x00000000
> > > [ 1.336011] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: DMA_MST_CTRL: 0x04100004
> > > [ 1.341838] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: DMA_CFG_A: 0x00000fff
> > > [ 1.347415] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: DMA_CFG_B: 0x0000001b
> > > [ 1.352991] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: FIFO_CTRL: 0x0000aa00
> > > [reset]
> > > [ 1.358559] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: Tegra NAND controller register
> > > dump
> > > [ 1.365352] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: COMMAND: 0x00800004
> > > [ 1.370744] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: STATUS: 0x00000101
> > > [ 1.376060] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: ISR: 0x00000100
> > > [ 1.381105] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: IER: 0x00000000
> > > [ 1.386161] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: CONFIG: 0x10030000
> > > [ 1.391466] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: TIMING: 0x00000000
> > > [ 1.396782] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: TIMING2: 0x00000000
> > > [ 1.402174] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: CMD_REG1: 0x00000000
> > > [ 1.407664] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: CMD_REG2: 0x00000000
> > > [ 1.413156] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: ADDR_REG1: 0x00000000
> > > [ 1.418722] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: ADDR_REG2: 0x00000000
> > > [ 1.424297] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: DMA_MST_CTRL: 0x24000000
> > > [ 1.430123] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: DMA_CFG_A: 0x00000000
> > > [ 1.435698] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: DMA_CFG_B: 0x00000000
> > > [ 1.441264] tegra-nand 70008000.nand: FIFO_CTRL: 0x0000aa00
> >
> > Alright, then indeed it's not really worth to bother with HW resetting
> > here. Probably only a kernel module reload or a reboot will help if HW is
> > hung. Maybe NAND controller / chip recovering is something that NAND core
> > should be handling in a such case by providing a nand_controller_reset()
> > hook?
> I don't see what the core could do to help with that. We'd end up with
> a new hook implemented by the controller that would be called by the
> controller driver when it knows it's safe to reset the controller. So,
> why bother exposing that in the core?
Giving a driver more flexibility is always a good thing. I'm not really
familiar with mtd/ and maybe indeed it doesn't make much sense to move HW
resetting to NAND core, though it looked to me that it should be always safe
for NAND core to initiate HW resetting after IO failure and hence would be
cleaner and nicer to have a unified HW reset management rather than to have
each driver to do its own thing.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists