linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] EDAC, altera: Fix an error handling path in 'altr_s10_sdram

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <092ce90c-1f68-1041-4385-997dcb13bc22@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Jun 2018 09:53:53 -0500
From:   Thor Thayer <thor.thayer@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>, bp@...en8.de,
        mchehab@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] EDAC, altera: Fix an error handling path in
 'altr_s10_sdram_probe()'

On 06/10/2018 12:45 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> IF 'regmap_write()' fails, we should release some resources as done in all
> the other error handling paths of the function.
> 
> Fixes: e9918d7fafae ("EDAC, altera: Handle SDRAM Uncorrectable Errors on Stratix10")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
> v1 -> v2: Fix subject line
> ---
>   drivers/edac/altera_edac.c | 3 ++-
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
> index d0d5c4dbe097..5762c3c383f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
> @@ -730,7 +730,8 @@ static int altr_s10_sdram_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   			 S10_DDR0_IRQ_MASK)) {
>   		edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_MC,
>   			    "Error clearing SDRAM ECC count\n");
> -		return -ENODEV;
> +		ret = -ENODEV;
> +		goto err2;
>   	}
>   
>   	if (regmap_update_bits(drvdata->mc_vbase, priv->ecc_irq_en_offset,
> Thanks.

Reviewed-by: Thor Thayer <thor.thayer@...ux.intel.com>