[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4F0D6729-AE77-47D4-9765-FBC44181D4DE@holtmann.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 17:47:14 +0200
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Attila Tőkés <attitokes@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
Artiom Vaskov <velemas@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:BLUETOOTH DRIVERS" <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Configure SCO routing automatically
Hi Rob,
>>>> Added support to automatically configure the SCO packet routing at the
>>>> device setup. The SCO packets are used with the HSP / HFP profiles, but in
>>>> some devices (ex. CYW43438) they are routed to a PCM output by default. This
>>>> change allows sending the vendor specific HCI command to configure the SCO
>>>> routing. The parameters of the command are loaded from the device tree.
>>>
>>> Please wrap your commit msg.
>>
>>
>> Sure.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Attila Tőkés <attitokes@...il.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.txt | 7 ++
>>>
>>> Please split bindings to separate patch.
>>
>>
>> Ok, I will split this in two.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git
>>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.txt
>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.txt
>>>> index 4194ff7e..aea3a094 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.txt
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.txt
>>>> @@ -21,6 +21,12 @@ Optional properties:
>>>> - clocks: clock specifier if external clock provided to the controller
>>>> - clock-names: should be "extclk"
>>>>
>>>> + SCO routing parameters:
>>>> + - sco-routing: 0-3 (PCM, Transport, Codec, I2S)
>>>> + - pcm-interface-rate: 0-4 (128 Kbps - 2048 Kbps)
>>>> + - pcm-frame-type: 0 (short), 1 (long)
>>>> + - pcm-sync-mode: 0 (slave), 1 (master)
>>>> + - pcm-clock-mode: 0 (slave), 1 (master)
>>>
>>> Are these Broadcom specific? Properties need either vendor prefix or
>>> to be documented in a common location. I think these look like the
>>> latter.
>>
>>
>> These will be used as parameters of a vendor specific (Broadcom/Cypress)
>> command configuring the SCO packet routing. See the Write_SCO_PCM_Int_Param
>> command from: http://www.cypress.com/file/298311/download.
>
> The DT should just describe how the h/w is hooked-up. What the s/w has
> to do based on that is the driver's problem which is certainly
> vendor/chip specific, but that is all irrelevant to the binding.
>
>> What would be the property names with a Broadcom / Cypress vendor prefix?
>>
>> brcm,sco-routing
>> brcm,pcm-interface-rate
>> brcm,pcm-frame-type
>> brcm,pcm-sync-mode
>> brcm,pcm-clock-mode
>>
>> ?
>
> Yes.
we can do this. However all pcm-* are optional if you switch the HCI transport. And sco-routing should default to HCI if that is not present. Meaning a driver should actively trying to change this. Nevertheless, it would be good if a driver reads the current settings.
In theory we could make sco-routing generic, but so many vendors have different modes, that we better keep this vendor specific.
Regards
Marcel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists