[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180611164653.13691-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 17:46:53 +0100
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][V2] drm/i915/guc: fix GEM_BUG_ON check
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
The check for level being less than zero always false because flags
is currently unsigned and can never be negative. Fix this by making
flags a s32.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1468363 ("Macro compares unsigned to 0")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
V2: Make flags s32 rather than remove the GEM_BUG_ON check, thanks to
Ville Syrjälä for spotting the mistake in my first attempt.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
index 116f4ccf1bbd..fb31f5004bcf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ void intel_guc_fini(struct intel_guc *guc)
static u32 get_log_control_flags(void)
{
u32 level = i915_modparams.guc_log_level;
- u32 flags = 0;
+ s32 flags = 0;
GEM_BUG_ON(level < 0);
--
2.17.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists