linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] f2fs update for 4.18-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 11 Jun 2018 11:54:07 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>
Cc:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        "Linux F2FS DEV, Mailing List" 
        <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] f2fs update for 4.18-rc1

On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 11:21 AM Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com> wrote:
>
> Argh, you used my Outlook email address, so you get top-posting

Hey, I think it's what you uise for your commit messages, I think
that's where I got it from..

> The radix tree does rely on constructors still.  One of the things on my todo list is to verify whether it actually makes sense to do that or not.

Ok, thanks.

> I don't really understand why Jaegeuk is changing f2fs now when we've just fixed the core kernel to make what he's doing perfectly legal.

I'm assuming it was based on the state when it wasn't legal yet.

             Linus