[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48143872d69d231273bd2c8ed835cbf0046a263d.camel@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 16:57:24 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Karim Eshapa <karim.eshapa@...il.com>, lars@...afoo.de
Cc: Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, jic23@...nel.org, knaack.h@....de,
pmeerw@...erw.net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging:iio:accel:adis16240: sign extend function
avoiding code duplication
On Tue, 2018-06-12 at 01:38 +0200, Karim Eshapa wrote:
> Use sign_extend32 kernel function instead of code duplication.
> Safe also for 16 bit.
Perhaps remove the bits declaration and assignments
and just use 9 directly.
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/accel/adis16240.c b/drivers/staging/iio/accel/adis16240.c
[]
> @@ -292,9 +292,7 @@ static int adis16240_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> ret = adis_read_reg_16(st, addr, &val16);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> - val16 &= (1 << bits) - 1;
> - val16 = (s16)(val16 << (16 - bits)) >> (16 - bits);
> - *val = val16;
> + *val = sign_extend32(val16, bits - 1);
> return IIO_VAL_INT;
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_PEAK:
> bits = 10;
> @@ -302,9 +300,7 @@ static int adis16240_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> ret = adis_read_reg_16(st, addr, &val16);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> - val16 &= (1 << bits) - 1;
> - val16 = (s16)(val16 << (16 - bits)) >> (16 - bits);
> - *val = val16;
> + *val = sign_extend32(val16, bits - 1);
> return IIO_VAL_INT;
> }
> return -EINVAL;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists