[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180613074141.GA12033@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 00:41:41 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, robh@...nel.org,
pawel.moll@....com, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
aik@...abs.ru, jasowang@...hat.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, joe@...ches.com,
"Rustad, Mark D" <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>,
david@...son.dropbear.id.au, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net,
Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC V2] virtio: Add platform specific DMA API translation for
virito devices
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 01:29:18PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> At the risk of repeating myself, let's just do the first pass which is
> to switch virtio over to always using the DMA API in the actual data
> flow code, with a hook at initialization time that replaces the DMA ops
> with some home cooked "direct" ops in the case where the IOMMU flag
> isn't set.
>
> This will be equivalent to what we have today but avoids having 2
> separate code path all over the driver.
>
> Then a second stage, I think, is to replace this "hook" so that the
> architecture gets a say in the matter.
I don't think we can actually use dma_direct_ops. It still allows
architectures to override parts of the dma setup, which virtio seems
to blindly assume phys == dma and not cache flushing.
I think the right way forward is to either add a new
VIRTIO_F_IS_PCI_DEVICE (or redefine the existing iommu flag if deemed
possible). And then make sure recent qemu always sets it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists