linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 04/13] s390: vfio-ap: base implementation of VFIO AP device driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180613094812.1fd1846d.cohuck@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Jun 2018 09:48:12 +0200
From:   Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
To:     Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, freude@...ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
        kwankhede@...dia.com, bjsdjshi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
        pmorel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, alifm@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        mjrosato@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        thuth@...hat.com, pasic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, berrange@...hat.com,
        fiuczy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, buendgen@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/13] s390: vfio-ap: base implementation of VFIO AP
 device driver

On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 09:41:16 +0200
Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:

> On 07/05/2018 17:11, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> > Introduces a new AP device driver. This device driver
> > is built on the VFIO mediated device framework. The framework
> > provides sysfs interfaces that facilitate passthrough
> > access by guests to devices installed on the linux host.  
> ...snip...
> 
> > +static int vfio_ap_matrix_dev_create(void)
> > +{
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	vfio_ap_root_device = root_device_register(VFIO_AP_ROOT_NAME);
> > +
> > +	if (IS_ERR(vfio_ap_root_device)) {
> > +		ret = PTR_ERR(vfio_ap_root_device);
> > +		goto done;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ap_matrix = kzalloc(sizeof(*ap_matrix), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!ap_matrix) {
> > +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> > +		goto matrix_alloc_err;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ap_matrix->device.type = &vfio_ap_dev_type;
> > +	dev_set_name(&ap_matrix->device, "%s", VFIO_AP_DEV_NAME);
> > +	ap_matrix->device.parent = vfio_ap_root_device;
> > +	ap_matrix->device.release = vfio_ap_matrix_dev_release;
> > +	ap_matrix->device.driver = &vfio_ap_drv.driver;
> > +
> > +	ret = device_register(&ap_matrix->device);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		goto matrix_reg_err;
> > +
> > +	goto done;
> > +
> > +matrix_reg_err:
> > +	put_device(&ap_matrix->device);  
> 
> Did not see this before but here you certainly want to
> do a kfree and not a put_device.

No, this must not be a kfree. Once you've tried to register something
embedding a struct device with the driver core, you need to use
put_device, as another path may have acquired a reference, even if
registering ultimately failed. See the comment for device_register().
IOW, the code is correct.

> 
> 
> 
> > +
> > +matrix_alloc_err:
> > +	root_device_unregister(vfio_ap_root_device);
> > +
> > +done:
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void vfio_ap_matrix_dev_destroy(struct ap_matrix *ap_matrix)
> > +{
> > +	device_unregister(&ap_matrix->device);
> > +	root_device_unregister(vfio_ap_root_device);  
> 
> Also here you need a kfree(ap_matrix) too .

Same here.