lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 13 Jun 2018 16:05:55 +0800
From:   Stu Hsieh <stu.hsieh@...iatek.com>
To:     CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
CC:     Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/28] drm/mediatek: add DPI1/DSI1/DSI2/DSI3 in comp_init

Hi, CK:

On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 15:35 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> Hi, Stu:
> 
> On Mon, 2018-06-11 at 11:26 +0800, Stu Hsieh wrote:
> > This patch add components DPI1/DSI1/DSI2/DSI3 in comp_init.
> > Because the some parameter for these components initialized
> > in their driver.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stu Hsieh <stu.hsieh@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > index 22f4c72fa785..ff974d82a4a6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > @@ -278,7 +278,11 @@ int mtk_ddp_comp_init(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node,
> >  
> >  	if (comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_BLS ||
> >  	    comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_DPI0 ||
> > +	    comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_DPI1 ||
> 
> Why not move this modification to the patch 'add component DPI1'?
> 
> >  	    comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI0 ||
> > +	    comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI1 ||
> > +	    comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI2 ||
> 
> Why not move this modification to the patch 'add component DSI2'?
> 
> > +	    comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI3 ||
> 
> Why not move this modification to the patch 'add component DSI3'?
> 
> Regards,
> CK
> 
ok

Regard,
Stu
> >  	    comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_PWM0) {
> >  		comp->regs = NULL;
> >  		comp->clk = NULL;
> 
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ