[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1806131121180.2280@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 11:26:49 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@...cle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 12/23] kernel/watchdog: Introduce a struct for NMI
watchdog operations
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 05:41:41PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 17:57:32 -0700
> > Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Instead of exposing individual functions for the operations of the NMI
> > > watchdog, define a common interface that can be used across multiple
> > > implementations.
> > >
> > > The struct nmi_watchdog_ops is defined for such operations. These initial
> > > definitions include the enable, disable, start, stop, and cleanup
> > > operations.
> > >
> > > Only a single NMI watchdog can be used in the system. The operations of
> > > this NMI watchdog are accessed via the new variable nmi_wd_ops. This
> > > variable is set to point the operations of the first NMI watchdog that
> > > initializes successfully. Even though at this moment, the only available
> > > NMI watchdog is the perf-based hardlockup detector. More implementations
> > > can be added in the future.
> >
> > Cool, this looks pretty nice at a quick glance. sparc and powerpc at
> > least have their own NMI watchdogs, it would be good to have those
> > converted as well.
>
> Yeah, agreed, this looks like half a patch.
Though I'm not seeing the advantage of it. That kind of NMI watchdogs are
low level architecture details so having yet another 'ops' data structure
with a gazillion of callbacks, checks and indirections does not provide
value over the currently available weak stubs.
> > Is hpet a cross platform thing, or just x86? We should avoid
> > proliferation of files under kernel/ I think, so with these watchdog
> > driver structs then maybe implementations could go in drivers/ or
> > arch/
>
> HPET is mostly an x86 thing (altough it can be found elsewhere), but the
On ia64 and I doubt that anyone wants to take on the task of underwater
welding it to Itanic.
> whole thing relies on the x86 NMI mechanism and is thus firmly arch/
> material (like the sparc and ppc thing).
Right. Trying to make this 'generic' is not really solving anything.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists