[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9577C59DB499174B9340876B077C2E9569DF11EC@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 00:05:55 +0000
From: "Xu, Even" <even.xu@...el.com>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
CC: "benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com" <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] hid: intel_ish-hid: ipc: register more pm callbacks to
support hibernation
Ok, sure, I will update patch comments and resubmit.
Thanks Srinivas!
Best Regards,
Even Xu
-----Original Message-----
From: Srinivas Pandruvada [mailto:srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 11:31 PM
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>; Xu, Even <even.xu@...el.com>
Cc: benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com; linux-input@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Xu, Even <even.xu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hid: intel_ish-hid: ipc: register more pm callbacks to support hibernation
On Tue, 2018-06-12 at 16:53 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jun 2018, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
>
> > From: Even Xu <even.xu@...el.com>
> >
> > Current ish driver only register resume/suspend PM callbacks which
> > don't support hibernation (suspend to disk). Now use the
> > SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() MACRO instead of struct dev_pm_ops directly.
> > The suspend and resume functions will now be used for both suspend
> > to RAM and hibernation.
> >
> > If power management is disable, SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS will do nothing,
> > the suspend and resume related functions won't be used, so mark them
> > as __maybe_unused to clarify that this is intended behavior, and
> > remove #ifdefs for power management.
>
> This describes details the patch does on code level, but what are the
> user observable effects? Hibernation resume doesn't fail any more?
> Hibernation
> is possible (and wasn't before)? Did kernel crash while trying to
> hibernate and this is the fix? Or ... ?
Even,
Can you add more details and resubmit ASAP?
Basically after hiberation, the ISH can't resume properly and user may not see sensor events (for example: screen rotation may not work).
User will not see a crash or panic or anything except the following message in log:
hid-sensor-hub 001F:8086:22D8.0001: timeout waiting for response from ISHTP device
So this is adding support for S4/hiberbation to ISH.
Thanks,
Srinivas
>
> Thanks,
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists