linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: don't use privcmd_call() from xen_mc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d1ed4fec-d02f-0f0a-f4c3-ecfb04249613@suse.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Jun 2018 13:12:33 +0200
From:   Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To:     Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
Cc:     xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: don't use privcmd_call() from
 xen_mc_flush()

On 13/06/18 12:20, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 13.06.18 at 12:05, <JBeulich@...e.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 13.06.18 at 11:58, <jgross@...e.com> wrote:
>>> Using privcmd_call() for a singleton multicall seems to be wrong, as
>>> privcmd_call() is using stac()/clac() to enable hypervisor access to
>>> Linux user space.
>>>
>>> Add a new xen_single_call() function to be use for that purpose.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
> 
> Actually I've only now realized that this isn't a real problem right now:
> PV can't use SMAP (we don't provide a virtualized version of it), and
> HVM/PVH can't use multicalls (which may have to change for PVH Dom0,
> so having the change in place is helpful anyway), so the whole
> in-kernel logic to collect and issue batches should be unreachable there.
> 
> But perhaps the commit message would benefit from a little bit of
> re-wording.

Hmm, right.

What about:

"Using privcmd_call() for a singleton multicall seems to be wrong, as
 privcmd_call() is using stac()/clac() to enable hypervisor access to
 Linux user space.

 Even if currently not a problem (pv domains can't use SMAP while HVM
 and PVH domains can't use multicalls) things might change when
 PVH dom0 support is added to the kernel."


Juergen