linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 04/13] s390: vfio-ap: base implementation of VFIO AP device driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <7237751c-66b5-d14c-5b71-cc1cfc79db87@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Jun 2018 14:01:54 +0200
From:   Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
Cc:     Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, freude@...ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
        kwankhede@...dia.com, bjsdjshi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
        pmorel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, alifm@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        mjrosato@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        thuth@...hat.com, pasic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, berrange@...hat.com,
        fiuczy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, buendgen@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/13] s390: vfio-ap: base implementation of VFIO AP
 device driver

On 13/06/2018 13:14, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 12:54:40 +0200
> Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> On 13/06/2018 09:48, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 09:41:16 +0200
>>> Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>   
>>>> On 07/05/2018 17:11, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>>>>> Introduces a new AP device driver. This device driver
>>>>> is built on the VFIO mediated device framework. The framework
>>>>> provides sysfs interfaces that facilitate passthrough
>>>>> access by guests to devices installed on the linux host.
>>>> ...snip...
>>>>   
>>>>> +static int vfio_ap_matrix_dev_create(void)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +	int ret;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	vfio_ap_root_device = root_device_register(VFIO_AP_ROOT_NAME);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	if (IS_ERR(vfio_ap_root_device)) {
>>>>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(vfio_ap_root_device);
>>>>> +		goto done;
>>>>> +	}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	ap_matrix = kzalloc(sizeof(*ap_matrix), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>> +	if (!ap_matrix) {
>>>>> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
>>>>> +		goto matrix_alloc_err;
>>>>> +	}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	ap_matrix->device.type = &vfio_ap_dev_type;
>>>>> +	dev_set_name(&ap_matrix->device, "%s", VFIO_AP_DEV_NAME);
>>>>> +	ap_matrix->device.parent = vfio_ap_root_device;
>>>>> +	ap_matrix->device.release = vfio_ap_matrix_dev_release;
>>>>> +	ap_matrix->device.driver = &vfio_ap_drv.driver;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	ret = device_register(&ap_matrix->device);
>>>>> +	if (ret)
>>>>> +		goto matrix_reg_err;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	goto done;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +matrix_reg_err:
>>>>> +	put_device(&ap_matrix->device);
>>>> Did not see this before but here you certainly want to
>>>> do a kfree and not a put_device.
>>> No, this must not be a kfree. Once you've tried to register something
>>> embedding a struct device with the driver core, you need to use
>>> put_device, as another path may have acquired a reference, even if
>>> registering ultimately failed. See the comment for device_register().
>>> IOW, the code is correct.
>> learned something again :) ,
>> but still, a kfree is needed for the kzalloc.
>> Does'nt it?
> No, the put callback for the embedding structure needs to take care of
> freeing things. Otherwise it is buggy.

Seems buggy to me.
How does the put_device knows if it is embedded and then in what it is 
embedded ?

>
>>>   
>>>>   
>>>>> +
>>>>> +matrix_alloc_err:
>>>>> +	root_device_unregister(vfio_ap_root_device);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +done:
>>>>> +	return ret;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static void vfio_ap_matrix_dev_destroy(struct ap_matrix *ap_matrix)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +	device_unregister(&ap_matrix->device);
>>>>> +	root_device_unregister(vfio_ap_root_device);
>>>> Also here you need a kfree(ap_matrix) too .
>>> Same here.
>>>   


-- 
Pierre Morel
Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany