lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAB4CAweUHcKY0+dGhoBNd8VqLc=XYbU_a8qpzHX6us4vVBE-KA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Jun 2018 20:14:13 +0800
From:   Chris Chiu <chiu@...lessm.com>
To:     Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@...il.com>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        acpi4asus-user <acpi4asus-user@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Linux Upstreaming Team <linux@...lessm.com>,
        Chris Chiu <chiu@...lessm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] platform/x86: asus-wmi: Call led hw_changed API on
 kbd brightness change

On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 3:18 PM, Chris Chiu <chiu@...lessm.com> wrote:
> Make asus-wmi notify on hotkey kbd brightness changes, listen for
> brightness events and update the brightness directly in the driver.
> For this purpose, bound check on brightness in kbd_led_set must be
> based on the same data type to prevent illegal value been set.
>
> Update the brightness by led_classdev_notify_brightness_hw_changed.
> This will allow userspace to monitor (poll) for brightness changes
> on the LED without reporting via input keymapping.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Chiu <chiu@...lessm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
> index 1f6e68f0b646..a18484f4bae3 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
> @@ -460,6 +460,7 @@ static void kbd_led_update(struct work_struct *work)
>                 ctrl_param = 0x80 | (asus->kbd_led_wk & 0x7F);
>
>         asus_wmi_set_devstate(ASUS_WMI_DEVID_KBD_BACKLIGHT, ctrl_param, NULL);
> +       led_classdev_notify_brightness_hw_changed(&asus->kbd_led, asus->kbd_led_wk);
>  }
>
>  static int kbd_led_read(struct asus_wmi *asus, int *level, int *env)
> @@ -497,9 +498,9 @@ static void kbd_led_set(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
>
>         asus = container_of(led_cdev, struct asus_wmi, kbd_led);
>
> -       if (value > asus->kbd_led.max_brightness)
> +       if ((int)value > (int)asus->kbd_led.max_brightness)
>                 value = asus->kbd_led.max_brightness;
> -       else if (value < 0)
> +       else if ((int)value < 0)
>                 value = 0;
>
>         asus->kbd_led_wk = value;
> @@ -656,6 +657,7 @@ static int asus_wmi_led_init(struct asus_wmi *asus)
>
>                 asus->kbd_led_wk = led_val;
>                 asus->kbd_led.name = "asus::kbd_backlight";
> +               asus->kbd_led.flags = LED_BRIGHT_HW_CHANGED;
>                 asus->kbd_led.brightness_set = kbd_led_set;
>                 asus->kbd_led.brightness_get = kbd_led_get;
>                 asus->kbd_led.max_brightness = 3;
> @@ -1745,6 +1747,15 @@ static void asus_wmi_notify(u32 value, void *context)
>                 }
>         }
>
> +       if (code == NOTIFY_KBD_BRTUP) {
> +               kbd_led_set(&asus->kbd_led, asus->kbd_led_wk + 1);
> +               goto exit;
> +       }
> +       if (code == NOTIFY_KBD_BRTDWN) {
> +               kbd_led_set(&asus->kbd_led, asus->kbd_led_wk - 1);
> +               goto exit;
> +       }
> +
>         if (is_display_toggle(code) &&
>             asus->driver->quirks->no_display_toggle)
>                 goto exit;
> --
> 2.11.0
>

Gentle ping. Any suggestions? The v2 is based on the last comment from
Hans, https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/5/270. Please let me know if nay. Thanks

Chris

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ