[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1528906474.2289.155.camel@codethink.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 17:14:34 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
To: Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@...cle.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 110/268] nvme-pci: Fix nvme queue cleanup if IRQ
setup fails
On Mon, 2018-05-28 at 12:01 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> ------------------
>
> From: Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@...cle.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit f25a2dfc20e3a3ed8fe6618c331799dd7bd01190 ]
>
> This patch fixes nvme queue cleanup if requesting an IRQ handler for
> the queue's vector fails. It does this by resetting the cq_vector to
> the uninitialized value of -1 so it is ignored for a controller reset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@...cle.com>
> [changelog updates, removed misc whitespace changes]
> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/pci.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> @@ -1583,7 +1583,7 @@ static int nvme_create_queue(struct nvme
> nvmeq->cq_vector = qid - 1;
> result = adapter_alloc_cq(dev, qid, nvmeq);
> if (result < 0)
> - return result;
> + goto release_vector;
>
> result = adapter_alloc_sq(dev, qid, nvmeq);
> if (result < 0)
> @@ -1597,9 +1597,12 @@ static int nvme_create_queue(struct nvme
> return result;
>
> release_sq:
> + dev->online_queues--;
This addition looks wrong. dev->online_queues is incremented by
nvme_init_queue(), but this function only calls that at a point where
it is sure to succeed. So why would a failure path need to decrement
it?
Ben.
> adapter_delete_sq(dev, qid);
> release_cq:
> adapter_delete_cq(dev, qid);
> + release_vector:
> + nvmeq->cq_vector = -1;
> return result;
> }
>
>
>
>
--
Ben Hutchings, Software Developer Codethink Ltd
https://www.codethink.co.uk/ Dale House, 35 Dale Street
Manchester, M1 2HF, United Kingdom
Powered by blists - more mailing lists