| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <b7a048ae-830f-9da0-9548-ea6d34db9756@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:38:36 -0700
From: J Freyensee <why2jjj.linux@...il.com>
To: peter enderborg <peter.enderborg@...y.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Daniel Jurgens <danielj@...lanox.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] selinux: Cleanup printk logging in conditional
On 6/12/18 11:23 PM, peter enderborg wrote:
> On 06/12/2018 04:38 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Tue, 2018-06-12 at 10:09 +0200, Peter Enderborg wrote:
>>> Replace printk with pr_* to avoid checkpatch warnings.
>> I believe it would be nicer to remove the
>> "SELinux: " prefix embbeded in each format
>> and use a specific
>>
>> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "SELinux: " fmt
>>
>> to automatically prefix these formats.
> I cant argument about that, however some of the warnings and debug prints in this set does not have this
> so it will then change the actual output. (And I also think that they should have a the prefix, but I don't
> know why they don't) So I am not sure if it appropriate for a cleanup patch, it supposed to have no functional change.
I would suggest that could be a follow-up patch.
I do like the cleanup, and it's better than the status quo.
Acked-by: Jay Freyensee <why2jjj.linux@...il.com>
>>> diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c b/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c
>> []
>>> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ int evaluate_cond_node(struct policydb *p, struct cond_node *node)
>>> if (new_state != node->cur_state) {
>>> node->cur_state = new_state;
>>> if (new_state == -1)
>>> - printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: expression result was undefined - disabling all rules.\n");
>>> + pr_err("SELinux: expression result was undefined - disabling all rules.\n");
>>> /* turn the rules on or off */
>>> for (cur = node->true_list; cur; cur = cur->next) {
>>> if (new_state <= 0)
>> So, for instance, this patch could become:
>> (etc and so forth for each patch in this series)
>>
>> ---
>> security/selinux/ss/conditional.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c b/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c
>> index c91543a617ac..e96820d92b61 100644
>> --- a/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c
>> +++ b/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c
>> @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
>> * the Free Software Foundation, version 2.
>> */
>>
>> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "SELinux: " fmt
>> +
>> #include <linux/kernel.h>
>> #include <linux/errno.h>
>> #include <linux/string.h>
>> @@ -96,7 +98,7 @@ int evaluate_cond_node(struct policydb *p, struct cond_node *node)
>> if (new_state != node->cur_state) {
>> node->cur_state = new_state;
>> if (new_state == -1)
>> - printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: expression result was undefined - disabling all rules.\n");
>> + pr_err("expression result was undefined - disabling all rules\n");
>> /* turn the rules on or off */
>> for (cur = node->true_list; cur; cur = cur->next) {
>> if (new_state <= 0)
>> @@ -287,7 +289,7 @@ static int cond_insertf(struct avtab *a, struct avtab_key *k, struct avtab_datum
>> */
>> if (k->specified & AVTAB_TYPE) {
>> if (avtab_search(&p->te_avtab, k)) {
>> - printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: type rule already exists outside of a conditional.\n");
>> + pr_err("type rule already exists outside of a conditional\n");
>> goto err;
>> }
>> /*
>> @@ -302,7 +304,7 @@ static int cond_insertf(struct avtab *a, struct avtab_key *k, struct avtab_datum
>> node_ptr = avtab_search_node(&p->te_cond_avtab, k);
>> if (node_ptr) {
>> if (avtab_search_node_next(node_ptr, k->specified)) {
>> - printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: too many conflicting type rules.\n");
>> + pr_err("too many conflicting type rules\n");
>> goto err;
>> }
>> found = 0;
>> @@ -313,13 +315,13 @@ static int cond_insertf(struct avtab *a, struct avtab_key *k, struct avtab_datum
>> }
>> }
>> if (!found) {
>> - printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: conflicting type rules.\n");
>> + pr_err("conflicting type rules\n");
>> goto err;
>> }
>> }
>> } else {
>> if (avtab_search(&p->te_cond_avtab, k)) {
>> - printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: conflicting type rules when adding type rule for true.\n");
>> + pr_err("conflicting type rules when adding type rule for true\n");
>> goto err;
>> }
>> }
>> @@ -327,7 +329,7 @@ static int cond_insertf(struct avtab *a, struct avtab_key *k, struct avtab_datum
>>
>> node_ptr = avtab_insert_nonunique(&p->te_cond_avtab, k, d);
>> if (!node_ptr) {
>> - printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: could not insert rule.\n");
>> + pr_err("could not insert rule\n");
>> rc = -ENOMEM;
>> goto err;
>> }
>> @@ -387,12 +389,12 @@ static int cond_read_av_list(struct policydb *p, void *fp, struct cond_av_list *
>> static int expr_isvalid(struct policydb *p, struct cond_expr *expr)
>> {
>> if (expr->expr_type <= 0 || expr->expr_type > COND_LAST) {
>> - printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: conditional expressions uses unknown operator.\n");
>> + pr_err("conditional expressions uses unknown operator\n");
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> if (expr->bool > p->p_bools.nprim) {
>> - printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: conditional expressions uses unknown bool.\n");
>> + pr_err("conditional expressions uses unknown bool\n");
>> return 0;
>> }
>> return 1;
>>
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists