[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <A05971DC-4453-4615-9AE9-8C4608569427@canonical.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:45:23 +0800
From: Kai Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
P HeLiOn <perryhelionsemail@...il.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Possible regression caused by commit a192aa923b66a
Hi Rafael,
> On Jun 12, 2018, at 5:17 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
>
> On Monday, June 11, 2018 11:52:34 PM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> --000000000000703623056e64c488
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 8:26 AM, Kai-Heng Feng
>>> <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Rafael,
>>>>
>>>> There's a regression report [1] that says commit a192aa923b66a ("ACPI /
>>>> LPSS: Consolidate runtime PM and system sleep handling") is the first
>>>> bad
>>>> commit.
>>>>
>>>> From the looks of it, it didn't introduce any behavioral change. So your
>>>> help is appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774950
>>>
>>> Well, the only difference is the iosf quirk AFAICS, but that should be
>>> easy enough to check. I'll try to cut a patch for that later today.
>>
>> If the iosf quirk is the source of the problem, the attached patch
>> should help.
>
> The one below should be slightly better, please test this one.
Affected users reported that this patch solves the issue for them.
Kai-Heng
>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> #include <linux/pm_domain.h>
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> #include <linux/pwm.h>
> +#include <linux/suspend.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
>
> #include "internal.h"
> @@ -940,9 +941,10 @@ static void lpss_iosf_exit_d3_state(void
> mutex_unlock(&lpss_iosf_mutex);
> }
>
> -static int acpi_lpss_suspend(struct device *dev, bool wakeup)
> +static int acpi_lpss_suspend(struct device *dev, bool runtime)
> {
> struct lpss_private_data *pdata = acpi_driver_data(ACPI_COMPANION(dev));
> + bool wakeup = runtime || device_may_wakeup(dev);
> int ret;
>
> if (pdata->dev_desc->flags & LPSS_SAVE_CTX)
> @@ -955,13 +957,14 @@ static int acpi_lpss_suspend(struct devi
> * wrong status for devices being about to be powered off. See
> * lpss_iosf_enter_d3_state() for further information.
> */
> - if (lpss_quirks & LPSS_QUIRK_ALWAYS_POWER_ON && iosf_mbi_available())
> + if ((runtime || !pm_suspend_via_firmware()) &&
> + lpss_quirks & LPSS_QUIRK_ALWAYS_POWER_ON && iosf_mbi_available())
> lpss_iosf_enter_d3_state();
>
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int acpi_lpss_resume(struct device *dev)
> +static int acpi_lpss_resume(struct device *dev, bool runtime)
> {
> struct lpss_private_data *pdata = acpi_driver_data(ACPI_COMPANION(dev));
> int ret;
> @@ -970,7 +973,8 @@ static int acpi_lpss_resume(struct devic
> * This call is kept first to be in symmetry with
> * acpi_lpss_runtime_suspend() one.
> */
> - if (lpss_quirks & LPSS_QUIRK_ALWAYS_POWER_ON && iosf_mbi_available())
> + if ((runtime || !pm_resume_via_firmware()) &&
> + lpss_quirks & LPSS_QUIRK_ALWAYS_POWER_ON && iosf_mbi_available())
> lpss_iosf_exit_d3_state();
>
> ret = acpi_dev_resume(dev);
> @@ -994,12 +998,12 @@ static int acpi_lpss_suspend_late(struct
> return 0;
>
> ret = pm_generic_suspend_late(dev);
> - return ret ? ret : acpi_lpss_suspend(dev, device_may_wakeup(dev));
> + return ret ? ret : acpi_lpss_suspend(dev, false);
> }
>
> static int acpi_lpss_resume_early(struct device *dev)
> {
> - int ret = acpi_lpss_resume(dev);
> + int ret = acpi_lpss_resume(dev, false);
>
> return ret ? ret : pm_generic_resume_early(dev);
> }
> @@ -1014,7 +1018,7 @@ static int acpi_lpss_runtime_suspend(str
>
> static int acpi_lpss_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> {
> - int ret = acpi_lpss_resume(dev);
> + int ret = acpi_lpss_resume(dev, true);
>
> return ret ? ret : pm_generic_runtime_resume(dev);
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists