lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <355d6b1f-9188-e93b-9cf1-01ece1879cad@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Jun 2018 13:35:46 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Kai Huang <kai.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 03/17] mm/ksm: Do not merge pages with different KeyIDs

On 06/13/2018 01:31 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>> What actually happens without this patch in place?
> 
> One of processes would get the page mapped with wrong KeyID and see
> garbage. 

OK, but what about two pages with the same KeyID?  It's actually totally
possible for KSM to determine that two pages have the same plaintext and
merge them.  Why don't we do that?

> We setup mapping according to KeyID in vma->vm_page_prot.

Then why do we bother with page_keyid() and the page_ext stuff?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ