[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180613205129.GD26375@zn.tnic>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 22:51:29 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Pu Wen <puwen@...on.cn>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
x86@...nel.org, thomas.lendacky@....com, peterz@...radead.org,
tony.luck@...el.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, jgross@...e.com, rjw@...ysocki.net,
lenb@...nel.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org, mchehab@...nel.org,
trenn@...e.com, shuah@...nel.org, zhangpanyong@...on.cn,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-x86_64@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] Add support for Hygon's Dhyana Family 18h processor
On Sat, Jun 09, 2018 at 09:20:10PM +0800, Pu Wen wrote:
> As a new x86 CPU Vendor, Chengdu Haiguang IC Design Co., Ltd (Hygon)
> is a Joint Venture between AMD and Haiguang Information Technology Co.,
> Ltd., and aims at providing high performance x86 processor for China
> server market.
>
> The first generation Hygon's processor(Dhyana) originates from AMD
> technology and shares most of the architecture with AMD's family 17h,
> but with different CPU Vendor ID("HygonGenuine")/PCIE Device Vendor ID
> (0x1D94)/Family series number(Family 18h).
>
> To enable the support of Linux kernel to Hygon's CPU, we added a new
> vendor type (X86_VENDOR_HYGON, with value of 9) in arch/x86/include/
> asm/processor.h, and shared most of kernel support codes with AMD
> family 17h.
>
> These patches have been applied and tested successfully in Hygon's
> Dhyana SoC silicon. Also tested on AMD's EPYC (Family 17h) processor
> works fine and makes no harm to existing codes.
Well, I don't like this diffstat:
37 files changed, 183 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
which adds a lot of code checking this new vendor. But then it adds in
the AMD paths and I don't see it being any different from an AMD CPU. So
it does the same a Zen does but then it is Hygon.
So I'd prefer to *not* sprinkle those X86_VENDOR_HYGON checks everywhere
but simply have the vendor be X86_VENDOR_AMD and only the user-visible
reporting to show that it is Hygon. Because to the kernel it is an AMD
CPU - only the superficial attributes are something else. Oh well, and
PCI device IDs but that's like another CPU revision.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists