[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <HE1PR0802MB24121F0EEF8D7D643BC391A1EE7E0@HE1PR0802MB2412.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 21:07:33 +0000
From: Matt Sealey <Matt.Sealey@....com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Suzuki Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>
CC: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
"frowand.list@...il.com" <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Charles Garcia-Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@....com>,
John Horley <John.Horley@....com>,
"mike.leach@...aro.org" <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
"coresight@...ts.linaro.org" <coresight@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 6/8] dts: coresight: Clean up the device tree graph
bindings
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
>
> > So, if the suggestion is to use an existing property "unit", I am fine
> > with it, if people agree to it.
>
> If we're going to have something sharply different than ACPI I prefer
> Rob's idea.
What are you trying to say about being sharply different than ACPI?
Ta,
Matt
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists