linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: cygnus: Fix I2C controller interrupt type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 13 Jun 2018 16:36:13 -0700
From:   Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: cygnus: Fix I2C controller interrupt type



On 6/13/2018 4:33 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 06/13/2018 04:32 PM, Ray Jui wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/13/2018 12:49 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 06/12/2018 01:21 PM, Ray Jui wrote:
>>>> Fix I2C controller interrupt to use IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH for Broadcom
>>>> Cygnus SoC
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: b51c05a331ff ("ARM: dts: add I2C device nodes for Broadcom
>>>> Cygnus")
>>>
>>> This appears to be the only one that is truly needed here, the two
>>> others below probably just moved things around but the offending commit
>>> was already introduced in the above commit.
>>>
>>
>> Okay thanks. Will remove the other two "Fixes" below.
> 
> I can take care of that while applying the patches, no need for you to
> resubmit, for the whole series I mean.
> 

Excellent! Much appreciated!

>>
>>>> Fixes: 0f0b21a83ad2 ("ARM: dts: Move all Cygnus peripherals into axi
>>>> bus")
>>>> Fixes: 9c5101f7a253 ("ARM: dts: Reorder Cygnus peripherals")
>>>>
>>>
>>> There is no need for an extra line between the last Fixes: tag and your
>>> Signed-off-by tag.
>>>
>>
>> Got it, thanks!
> 
> And that as well.
> 

Thanks again!

Ray