lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 12 Jun 2018 20:26:46 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] KVM changes for 4.18 merge window

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 8:00 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Yeah, the biusection seems to actually be diving into Greg's device pulls.
>
> Odd. I'm not seeing why that would break kvm, but maybe there's
> something in the device core layer that really messed it up.
>
> I'll continue to bisect to see.

Ok, so commit 95cde3c59966 ("debugfs: inode: debugfs_create_dir uses
mode permission from parent") breaks lkvm, and I think qemu-kvm too.

The commit looks like the RightThing(tm) to do, but we do not break
existing work-flows, no matter how much we'd like to.  So it gets
reverted.

Greg, Thomas, perhaps some alternative model? I'm not sure exactly
what kvm needs from debugfs.

                   Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists