[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <85d6e86b7829b42e69feab8e8dbe93a30b5fa4f1.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 16:49:47 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@...data.co.jp>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
selinux@...ho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [-next PATCH] security: use octal not symbolic permissions
On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 10:19 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Using octal and not symbolic permissions is preferred by many as more
> > readable.
> >
> > see: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/2/1945
>
> Heh, well see also https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/2/2062 .
We all love Al.
I did reply then too.
cheers, Joe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists