lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 14 Jun 2018 18:38:10 +0800
From:   kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, robh@...nel.org,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        Amit Nischal <anischal@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rohit Kumar <rohitkr@...eaurora.org>,
        Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: qcom: Add lpass clock controller driver for
 SDM845

Hi Taniya,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on clk/clk-next]
[also build test WARNING on next-20180614]
[cannot apply to v4.17]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Taniya-Das/Add-support-for-LPASS-clock-controller-for-SDM845/20180614-155144
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git clk-next
reproduce:
        # apt-get install sparse
        make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
        make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

>> drivers/clk/qcom/lpasscc-sdm845.c:32:19: sparse: symbol 'gcc_lpass_sway_clk' was not declared. Should it be static?

Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ