[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <977a6d1c83b4084b949162258bb1007a@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 07:07:47 -0400
From: okaya@...eaurora.org
To: Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam@...adcom.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ACPI support in common clock framework
On 2018-06-14 06:58, Srinath Mannam wrote:
> Thank you Andy,
>
> Regards,
> Srinath.
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>> +Cc: Rafael, ACPI ML
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 7:14 AM, Srinath Mannam
>> <srinath.mannam@...adcom.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Michael, Stephen,
>>>
>>> We are adding ACPI support in our Linux based platform.
>>> At present our clock hierarchy using common clock framework through
>>> DTS.
>>> Now we required ACPI support in common clock framework to upgrade our
>>> platform.
>>>
>>> For example, clk_get API called in many drivers to get clock device
>>> is
>>> tightly coupled with DT framework.
>>>
>>> Please let us know, if anybody in Open Source community have plans to
>>> add ACPI support for common clock framework.
>>> If not please suggest us alternative method to use common clock
>>> framework in ACPI use case.
Are you hooking up clk apis to PS0/PS3 calls?
Clk api didn't play nice with acpi until now.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Srinath.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> With Best Regards,
>> Andy Shevchenko
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi"
> in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists