linux-kernel - Re: Restartable Sequences system call merged into Linux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1399480624.13011.1528984006717.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Jun 2018 09:46:46 -0400 (EDT)
From:   Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To:     Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
Cc:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, carlos <carlos@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        libc-alpha <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>
Subject: Re: Restartable Sequences system call merged into Linux

----- On Jun 14, 2018, at 9:32 AM, Florian Weimer fweimer@...hat.com wrote:

> On 06/14/2018 03:25 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> 
>> But the proposal wanted to add a syscall to thread creation, right?
>> And I believe that may be noticeable.
> 
> We already call set_robust_list, so we could just pass a larger area to
> that and the kernel could use it.  Then no additional system call would
> be needed in the common case (new kernel which recognizes the new area
> size).
> 
> But then we cannot use an initial-exec thread local variable for it
> (although the offset from the thread pointer will still be constant, of
> course).

I'm wondering whether we could turn the problem around: expose a new
system call allowing to register an array of pointers to per-thread data,
which would be used rather than set_robust_list when available. This way,
we could register both the robust list and rseq with a single system call,
e.g.:

enum linux_tls_area_type {
    LINUX_TLS_ROBUST_LIST,
    LINUX_TLS_RSEQ,
};

struct linux_tls_area_item {
    enum linux_tls_area_type type;
    void *p;
};

long sys_register_tls_areas(struct linux_tls_area_item *array, size_t nb)

This would allow registering various TLS data structures with a single
system call without hindering flexibility on the user-space side. For
instance, we could still use initial-exec and the __rseq_abi symbol for
rseq with this approach.

Thoughts ?

Thanks,

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com