[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180614185139.GG12198@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 20:51:39 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] locking: Implement an algorithm choice for
Wound-Wait mutexes
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 06:43:40PM +0200, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> Overall, I think this looks fine. I'll just fix up the FLAG_WAITERS setting
> and affected comments and do some torture testing on it.
Thanks!
> Are you OK with adding the new feature and the cleanup in the same patch?
I suppose so, trying to untangle that will be a bit of a pain. But if
you feel so inclined I'm not going to stop you :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists