[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874li4hayd.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 15:31:54 +1000
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tom Herbert <tom@...ntonium.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2] rhashtable: implement rhashtable_walk_peek() using rhashtable_walk_last_seen()
On Fri, Jun 15 2018, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 10:41:05AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 7:48 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > rhashtable_walk_last_seen() does most of the work that
>> > rhashtable_walk_peek() needs done, so use it and put
>> > it in a "static inline".
>> > Also update the documentation for rhashtable_walk_peek() to clarify
>> > the expected use case.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Tom Herbert <tom@...ntonium.net>
>
> Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Thanks to your both.
I assume this is an implicit Ack for
rhashtable: add rhashtable_walk_last_seen()
I'll send out a patchset of all the acked patches shortly after the
merge window closes, and then see where we are up to.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists