[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7860105c-553a-534b-57fc-222d931cb972@icdsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 17:26:04 +0300
From: Ivan Zahariev <famzah@...soft.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Cgroups "pids" controller does not update "pids.current" count
immediately
On 14.6.2018 г. 18:06 ч., Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 02:56:00PM +0300, Ivan Zahariev wrote:
>> I posted a kernel bug about this a month ago but it did not receive
>> any attention: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199713
>>
>> Here is a copy of the bug report and I hope that this is the correct
>> place to discuss this:
> Well, for now at least, that's the expected behavior. It's not
> supposed to be able to account all changes immediately (the kernel
> doesn't free a lot of things immediately for performance and other
> reasons). The intended use is setting up a reasonable upperbound with
> some buffer space.
If that's by design, it's a bit disappointing and at least the docs
should mention it.
The standard RLIMIT_NPROC does not suffer from such accounting
discrepancies at any time. The "memory" cgroups controller also does not
suffer from any discrepancies -- it accounts memory usage in real time
without any lag on process start or exit. The "tasks" file list is also
always up-to-date.
Is it really technically not possible to make "pids.current" do
accounting properly like RLIMIT_NPROC does? We were hoping to replace
RLIMIT_NPROC with the "pids" controller.
--Ivan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists