[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180615163406.GA8775@agluck-desk>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 09:34:06 -0700
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/mce: Check for alternate indication of machine
check recovery on Skylake
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 01:45:18PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 02:57:54PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 10:24:46PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > tglx just took 1 and 3, 2/3 had a minor issue but the merge window
> > > happened so I'll send it later. It is nice to have anyway.
> >
> > Did you fix up part 2/3?
>
> You said "Parts 1 & 2 are nice-to-have" and we have merge window now. So
> what exactly do you mean?
>
> > I see 1 & 3 were staged by Thomas in TIP ras/urgent and
> > ras-urgent-for-linus but haven't gone into Linus' tree yet.
>
> Merge window ain't over yet :)
"send it later" could be read a couple of ways.
I was just worried that Thomas is holding off asking Linus to pull
because he's waiting for part 2/3, while you might be planning to
hold onto part 2/3 for the next merge (and add the other cleanups
you RFC'd).
I'm OK either way on part 2/3 (it just makes for better error messages,
it doesn't fix any bugs).
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists