[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1069078546.14418.1529084651587.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 13:44:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, carlos <carlos@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
libc-alpha <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>
Subject: Re: Restartable Sequences system call merged into Linux
----- On Jun 15, 2018, at 1:10 AM, Florian Weimer fweimer@...hat.com wrote:
> On 06/14/2018 03:46 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> This would allow registering various TLS data structures with a single
>> system call without hindering flexibility on the user-space side. For
>> instance, we could still use initial-exec and the __rseq_abi symbol for
>> rseq with this approach.
>>
>> Thoughts ?
>
> Isn't this just a very narrow case of the usual batched syscalls
> proposal? 8-)
Pretty much. But let's not go there unless this is really needed.
It looks like the added syscall on thread creation is not an issue
so far.
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists