linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] x86/bugs: Switch the selection of mitigation from CPU vendor to CPU features

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 15 Jun 2018 20:57:40 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
cc:     Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@...zon.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] x86/bugs: Switch the selection of mitigation from
 CPU vendor to CPU features

On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 6/11/2018 9:01 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >> I think you will have to keep the case statements and explicitly check for
> >> X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD before using SPEC_CTRL.
> > 
> > .. we could or alternatively add an extra check for X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD ?
> 
> Whichever you feel is best, so long as we only use SPEC_CTRL for SSBD on
> AMD when X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD is present.

Is there anyone working on a fix or has this been forgotten?

Thanks,

	tglx