[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <cover.1529091248.git.leonard.crestez@nxp.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:43:41 +0300
From: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
To: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Marco Franchi <marcofrk@...il.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: imx: Make DRM_MXSFB and FB_MXS coexist
Some imx boards have new drm-style bindings for lcdif devices but using
them requires rebuilding the kernel with FB_MXS=n DRM_MXSFB=y.
It is relatively easy to allow both drivers to coexist by renaming
drm/mxsfb to "mxsfb-drm" and making the old fbdev driver return -ENODEV
instead of -ENOENT when it fails to find the display node.
This makes display on imx6sx-sdb "just work" with both styles of
bindings. In order to test the old bindings I locally reverted commit
7caa59e0d40c ("ARM: dts: imx6sx-sdb: Convert from fbdev to drm bindings")
Leonard Crestez (3):
drm: mxsfb: Change driver.name to mxsfb-drm
fbdev: mxsfb: Return ENODEV on missing display node
ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: Enable DRM_MXSFB
arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig | 2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c | 2 +-
drivers/video/fbdev/mxsfb.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists