lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180615171329.05f7e4de@vmware.local.home>
Date:   Fri, 15 Jun 2018 17:13:29 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sebastian Sewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: High-priority softirqs [was: [PATCH] usb: don't offload
 isochronous urb completions to ksoftirq]

On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 17:05:01 -0400 (EDT)
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com> wrote:


> I don't think that threaded interrupt handlers are a good idea.
> 
> There are existing tools such as rtkit in Linux distributions that 
> increase the priority of audio applications to real time. And if rtkit 
> increases the priority of audio player or audio server above the priority 
> of the interrupt thread that handles the soundcard - sound playback is 
> screwed.
> 
> You would have to set the priority of the interrupt thread to the highest 
> real-time priority - and in such a case, the interrupt thread is no 
> different than a hard-irq handler.

Perhaps rtkit et.al. should be updated to know about interrupt threads.
It's pretty trivial to know about them and that can easily be
automated. The only problem is to keep the irq thread higher than the
audio server. And we always tell people to never put a thread to the
maximum priority unless they had a damn good reason to do so.

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ