[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1806161525390.1582@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 15:27:59 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@...cle.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 20/23] watchdog/hardlockup/hpet: Rotate interrupt
among all monitored CPUs
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 12:29:06PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > You have to consider two cases:
> >
> > 1) !remapped mode:
> >
> > That's reasonably simple because you just have to deal with the HPET
> > TIMERn_PROCMSG_ROUT register. But then you need to do this directly and
> > not through any of the existing interrupt facilities.
>
> Indeed, there is no need to use the generic interrupt faciities to set affinity;
> I am dealing with an NMI anyways.
> >
> > 2) remapped mode:
> >
> > That's way more complex as you _cannot_ ever do anything which touches
> > the IOMMU and the related tables.
> >
> > So you'd need to reserve an IOMMU remapping entry for each CPU upfront,
> > store the resulting value for the HPET TIMERn_PROCMSG_ROUT register in
> > per cpu storage and just modify that one from NMI.
> >
> > Though there might be subtle side effects involved, which are related to
> > the acknowledge part. You need to talk to the IOMMU wizards first.
>
> I see. I will look into the code and prototype something that makes sense for
> the IOMMU maintainers.
I'd recommend to talk to them _before_ you cobble something together. If we
cannot reliably switch the affinity by directing the HPET NMI to a
different IOMMU remapping entry then the whole scheme does not work at all.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists