[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwRC6gszsHsGcOonV5SHDb7SxWKWbMQsTZ7KD85G_SnLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 10:27:27 +0900
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: yao.jin@...ux.intel.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] perf/core: Use sysctl to turn on/off dropping
leaked kernel samples
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 8:36 PM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
>
> At least for sampling the GPRs, we could do something like below
> unconditionally, which seems sufficient for my test cases.
Ack.
The PEBS case may need checking, but maybe PEBS doesn't even have this issue?
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists