[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNATbDmzgReA0UVbayaFKkC=mXL-psQbiXckuNvjpWyHpcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2018 09:47:30 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] Makefile: Prepare for using macros for inline asm
2018-06-14 5:36 GMT+09:00 Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>:
>>
>> > +macros: $(obj)/macros.s
>> > + @:
>>
>> If you add a phony target, it should be added to 'PHONY'.
>
> Or this part:
>> +archmacros:
>> + $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=arch/x86/kernel macros
>
> could be modified to specify the exact filename so this indirection is not needed.
Yes, it could work.
Actually, two styles co-exist in arch/x86/Makefile.
(archprepare vs archscripts)
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists