linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] hwrng: msm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <152933750484.16708.1950713243960317531@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:58:24 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...aro.org>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] hwrng: msm - Move hwrng to a table

Quoting Vinod Koul (2018-06-18 07:12:57)
> @@ -127,6 +125,13 @@ static void msm_rng_cleanup(struct hwrng *hwrng)
>         msm_rng_enable(hwrng, 0);
>  }
>  
> +static struct hwrng msm_rng = {
> +       .name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
> +       .init = msm_rng_init,
> +       .cleanup = msm_rng_cleanup,
> +       .read = msm_rng_read,
> +};
> +
>  static int msm_rng_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>         struct resource *res;
> @@ -148,12 +153,10 @@ static int msm_rng_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         if (IS_ERR(rng->clk))
>                 return PTR_ERR(rng->clk);
>  
> -       rng->hwrng.name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
> -       rng->hwrng.init = msm_rng_init,
> -       rng->hwrng.cleanup = msm_rng_cleanup,

Wouldn't it be a lot easier to skip assigning the init and cleanup
functions on v2 devices with an if statement? It would be smaller size
wise too because then we don't have two structs for v1 and v2 hwrngs.
Plus the patch would be smaller overall because we would do everything
else pretty much the same besides the if condition in probe.

> -       rng->hwrng.read = msm_rng_read,
> +       rng->hwrng = &msm_rng;
>  
> -       ret = devm_hwrng_register(&pdev->dev, &rng->hwrng);
> +       rng->hwrng->priv = (unsigned long)rng;
> +       ret = devm_hwrng_register(&pdev->dev, rng->hwrng);
>         if (ret) {
>                 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register hwrng\n");
>                 return ret;
> -- 
> 2.14.4
>